Sunday, March 21, 2010
Rule #5 Sunday
I beg forgiveness from my Hump Day Hotties readers, as this will be a rehash for you, but I have exclusive promotion rights with Moxie, which requires I post her pictures at least once more so I can get the chop shop that I really need in Mafia Wars. You understand...
A great many thanks to Smitty and The Other McCain for linking us last Sunday! We're keeping our fingers crossed that lightning will strike again this Sunday.
Rule #5 Sunday's are a great way to enjoy 'the bounty of God's creation,' as it were, and to introduce readers to new and exciting conservative women. This week's Rule #5 submission is conservative blogger Moxie X. Cathedra.
Moxie X. Cathedra is "a Los Angeles based writer, photographer, and technical geek who regrettably, has entered into a witness protection program requiring me to trot around the web under silly made-up aliases. I spend my spare time fussing and tinkering with my beloved 1985 Porsche 911." She blogs over at her place, Moxie.nu and hosts a radio show on Blog Talk Radio called the Humor Institute. The onwer of a facebook account which wont allow her to add her middle initial, she is always looking for new members for her mafia. She's an unapologetic atheist with a rapier wit and a looker to boot. Careful though boys, she's recently engaged and knows the true definition of gun control is using both hands. So without further ado, I give you our Sunday Rule #5 Hottie, Moxie X. Cathedra!
Be sure to drop her a line. And for the love of G_d, don't forget to check out her radio show!
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Costa IS Costing Ya
![]() |
| You know it's bad when your own party wants to toss you... |
Representative Jim Costa (D-Fresno) announced that he will vote for the Senate version of the health care bill. Costa shot to national attention this past week over allegations that he and another Valley Democrat, Cardoza (D-Modesto), were being bribed with water in order to secure a yes vote.
Costa joined Cardoza and a third valley Dem, Jerry McNerney of Pleasanton, in ending the "will they or won't they" speculation Saturday saying they were satisfied with the proposal after reading the bill's fine print.Apparently the NYT and the WAPO were able to sniff out the discrepancies in the reported numbers from the CBO, but Costa couldn't. But then again, we only elect the best and the brightest to Congress, right Alcee Hastings?
"For me, it boils down to this: Who makes the important health care decisions in our country - patients, their families and their doctors, or insurance companies?" Costa said in his release. "I was not willing to make a final decision on my vote until I saw the actual language in the bill to protect patients from losing their insurance coverage, from having their rates jacked through the ceiling, and from being denied coverage by insurance companies."
The language satisfied his concerns, he said.
He said 28 percent of the constituents in his district are uninsured and this bill, which he called "fiscally responsible," is first step to bridge that gap.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
11th Hour Reprieve?
![]() |
| Slaughter Solution, slaughtered? |
Is this a sign that Obamacare is headed for the trash heap? Or is it a sign that Pelosi feels she now has the votes that she needs on both bills to get them to pass separately?
Top Democrats confirmed Saturday that the House would hold separate votes on the Senate healthcare bill and the reconciliation bill, making fixes to it.Several on the right are optimistic that this could mean an end to the House adopting the Senate bill. However, there is speculation swirling that Pelosi has enough support for both bills separately to get the votes to pass the bills. Ed Morrissey, however, believes that this gives Pelosi an out:
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), one of the chief deputy whips, Rep. Melvin Watt (D-N.C.), and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), all of whom said that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) won't use the tactic of deem and pass for healthcare reform.
The move effectively kills the "deem and pass" strategy Democrats had been eyeing to make changes to the Senate bill through a rule on the bill, which at the same time would have deemed the original Senate healthcare bill to have passed the House.
The House appears set now to move toward an up-or-down vote on the Senate healthcare bill, as well as a separate, up-or-down vote on the series of changes to that bill. There will still be a vote on the rule, as there always is for a piece of legislation, though it will not package the two bills together.
Democrats moved toward separating the votes after several members, including Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), had said they could not support the procedural maneuver.
Cardoza confirmed the change in position by House leadership during a Rules Committee meeting Saturday afternoon.
...remember that DemonPass was intended to protect Dems opposed to the Cadillac Tax and other issues in the Senate bill. The politics of the bill have only become more fraught since they floated that strategy, which could mean that Democrats now think it won’t pass — and need a reason for its demise other than a failure of Pelosi to whip the count.
It will be interesting to see if there is enough time left to get a vote count before the actual vote is taken. I am trying not to be pessimistic, however, that is my nature...
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
I Knew Lee Harvey Was Framed!
This conspiracy starts at the top! Well, at least the 3rd floor, second stall from the right...
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Dodge Magnum
It's got a Hem--oh, wait...
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Friday Night Comedy Jam
The fun continues
Loser: Literal Video Version - watch more funny videos
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Friday Night Comedy Jam
Anna Nicole's mama said that I don't wanna see Anna fall down again...
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Informed Opinion Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Something Stinks: NYT and WAPO Admit CBO Numbers Don't Pass Smell Test
![]() |
| Pretty sure this is not the CBO that NYT or WAPO were referring to... |
Via Yid With Lid:
The WAPO analysis, pointed out that it is just an estimate and no one really knows for sure how the bills costs will really shake out and his particular estimate is more shaky than usual.
Budget experts generally have high praise for the work of CBO analysts, the non-ideological technocrats who crunch the numbers to estimate the fiscal impact of legislation. But their work is often more art than science, and although the forecasts that accompany legislation are always filled with uncertainty, this one contains more than most.
For example, the legislation contains subsidies for those who would not be able to afford health coverage on their own — but the cost of those subsidies could vary a lot depending on how much other elements of the legislation change the price of health insurance, such as through provisions requiring minimum coverage levels.
The New York Times goes even further, pointing out that there was no way the CBO report was going to show numbers that did not work out in favor of Obamacare:
Congressional Democrats have spent more than a year working with the nonpartisan budget office on the health care legislation, and as they fine-tuned many of the bill’s various provisions in recent weeks, they consulted repeatedly with its number-crunchers and the bipartisan staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation. In other words, the overall numbers were never going to miss the mark. Whenever the budget office judged that some element or elements of the bill would cause a problem meeting the cost and deficit-reduction targets, Democrats just adjusted the underlying legislation to make sure it would hit their goal.
In other words the bill precise language of the bill was written in a way to make the numbers look good, whether they actually do or not is another story all together.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Obama/Clinton Bundler Pleads Guilty To Bank Fraud
![]() |
| Borrowed from PI Bill Warner |
A little bit of good news, to temper the blow from the last post. From Reuters:
A wealthy businessman who raised money for leading Democratic Party politicians, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, pleaded guilty on Thursday to defrauding three major banks out of $292.2 million in loan transactions.I am completely shocked... No really, this is my shocked face. Clinton just can't catch a break, can she? First there was Norman Hsu, and now Nemazee... What's next?
Hassan Nemazee, 60, who once ran a private equity firm, admitted in Manhattan federal court to defrauding Bank of America Corp of more than $142 million, Citigroup Inc of $74.9 million and HSBC Holdings Plc of $74.9 million to pay his debt to Citigroup.
...
Nemazee was listed as one of the top "bundlers" of contributions to Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, according to OpenSecrets.org, a website run by the Center for Responsive Politics.
He typically donated more than $100,000 annually to Democratic Party political candidates, including Obama and now-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
...
The Democratic National Committee declined to comment, but an official said it had been previously announced that the affected donations would go to charity.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Picture of the Day
The 0ne garnered a higher disapproval than approval rating for the first time in the most recent Gallup poll, joining Rasmussen and PPP polling. Print it up, carry it around in your wallet. Place it on the pillow next to you in your bed. Do whatever you have to in order to get some sort of consolation for this report. Is this the end?!
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
The White House Bribes Another Congressman
![]() |
| Bart Gordon and friend check out Bart's new digs. |
And in other news, grass is, in fact green.
Via Instapundit:
Bart Gordon promised a job as NASA Administrator for Health Care vote?The Transterrestrial Musings post quotes from this Human Events Post.
Rand Simberg is not a Bart Gordon fan.
If true, this has at least two implications. First, the administration is willing to throw Charlie Bolden under the bus. Second, they’re also willing to throw the new plans for NASA under the bus for health care, because Gordon (who just happens to be the relevant committee chairman) has expressed skepticism about them.
There’s also a rumor that another retiring Tennessee Rep., John Tanner, has been promised a job as Ambassador to NATO. I wonder if Republicans in the Senate will interfere with appointments like this? I’d say so.
Most interesting rumor from the Hill yesterday: Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.) who announced his retirement from Congress has been promised the job of NASA administrator in exchange for his vote, and Rep. John Tanner (D-Tenn.), another retiring Democrat, has been promised an appointment as U.S. Ambassador to NATO in exchange for his vote.Glenn is reporting that Gordon has announced he is now a 'Yes' vote on the bill.
But shhhh! It's
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
CA Senate Race Tightening: Boxer Suddenly In Trouble
![]() |
| Senator Ma'am |
In a piece over at Hotline On Call, Steven Shepard breaks down the latest poll numbers in the CA Senatorial race:
A day after Sen. Barbara Boxer's (D-CA) camp announced that Pres. Obama would be traveling to Los Angeles for a joint fundraiser next month, a new Field Poll shows Boxer locked in tight races with each of the GOPers vying to challenge her in Nov.How to tell when a Congressman is completely detached from reality: When they bring out Leadfinger Obama to hold a fundraiser for their reelection. Brilliant move, ma'am.
...
General Election Matchups
Campbell 44% (+6) Boxer 45% (-5)
Boxer 43 (-5) Fiorina 44 (+9)
Boxer 45% (-6)
DeVore 41 (+7)
...
In a possible sign of Dems' concern over Boxer's re-election, the Boxer camp announced late yesterday that Obama would attend a joint fundraiser for their camp and the DNC in mid-April, though details have not yet been finalized.
It's important to note that all three of the Republican challengers are within the margin of error, indicating that anyone with a pulse is considered a threat to Boxer's reelection campaign. That's saying something, when California's liberal senators are in trouble, you know the Democrats are going to have a rough November.
Possibly related, the comedy gold that is 'Hot Air: The Movie.' If you haven't seen Carly Fiorina's latest
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Inevitable End To Constitutional Abortion
The Hill has the story:
In a 222-203 vote, Democrats beat back a GOP resolution offered by Democrat-turned-Republican Rep. Parker Griffith (Ala.) that would have forced lawmakers to vote on the Senate healthcare bill separately from the series of fixes they hope to make to that legislation.
All Republican lawmakers who voted opposed the measure, which had the effect of ending the GOP's effort to force a vote. They were joined by 28 Democrats, who broke with party members on the vote.
Two hundred and twenty-two Democrats supported the measure, though — enough to proceed. Three members of either party did not vote.
Michelle Malkin has the blow by blow:
You’ll recall that House Republicans unveiled a resolution two days ago that would force a vote on the Slaughter Solution and call out the Deem-and-Pass-ocrats.Michelle also has a roll call of the votes.
The vote on that resolution had been anticipated at around 12:30-1pm Eastern this afternoon. The time came and went.
...
Final vote 222-203 with six not voting. Remember in November.
Sounds to me as though it's time to flood congressional offices with another mail in item. Perhaps, we should send them copies of the constitution since they seem to be unfamiliar with it? Here is a website where you can order copies of the US Constitution for $1.00 or less plus shipping and handling, depending upon copies ordered. We've shut down the phone board, now it's time to clog the Congressional mail room. Make them know we are serious!
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Reconciliation Bill Details
| She has reason for that face shattering smile... |
Politico has published details of the House Reconciliation Bill. Below are some details from the bill. The full text is available over at Politico.
The 153-page bill makes a number of changes to the Senate bill. The highlights:'Health Care Reform' is not dead. As a matter of fact, several news sources are reporting that it's got new life and is uncomfortably close to having enough support to get passed. If you have not already, CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES NOW!
--Increases the tax credits for middle-income families who buy insurance.
--Reduces the penalty for not buying insurance from $750 to $695. But the bill also requires some people to pay a share of their income as a penalty and that number was raised from 2 percent to 2.5 percent.
--It closes the gap in Medicare prescription drug coverage by 2011 and gives seniors who fall into the gap this year a $250 rebate.
--It eliminates the Cornhusker Kickback and covers 100 percent of the increased Medicaid costs of all states until 2016 and decreases each year thereafter.
--Requires that doctors that care for Medicaid patients be reimbursed at the full rate.
--Spends $250 million to fight waste, fraud and abuse.
--Delays and blunts the tax on high-end insurance plans in keeping with the deal Democrats struck with the labor unions. However, it does lower the index at which plans will be taxed, making it likely that more plans will be affected over time.
--Imposes a Medicare tax on unearned income for families making more than $250,000.
--Includes student loan reform.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Truth From An Elected Democrat
Stop the presses! We've got an amazing nugget of honesty from an elected official regarding thieving politicians. While meeting with some Tea Party activists on March 16th, Congressman Tom Perreillo admits to what everyone already knows. Unless you tie the hands of politicians, you cannot keep them from raiding entitlements to fund pet projects. Take a listen for a refreshing bit of honesty from Washington DC.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
What's In A Name?
What is in a name, anyway? How bad would your name have to be in order for you to petition a court to have it changed? How about this bad?
Be sure to check them all out over at The Smoking Gun.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Be sure to check them all out over at The Smoking Gun.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
The Day the Mask Slipped UPDATED Working Video
Talk with anyone who shares an elevated interest in politics about the first time they remember feeling as though the network news media had an agenda, and the example they might well provide is this one. It was campaigns season in early 1988 and The CBS Evening News was profiling each of the major Presidential candidates. They were very interested to get then Vice President George H. W. Bush on for quite some time regarding another matter, the Iran-Contra affair. When the campaign season got into full swing and CBS had completed several profiles of the other Presidential Candidates, the Bush Team agreed to be interviewed for the purpose of profiling Bush's agenda and vision for the United States as President.
What follows is the story leading up to the interview, followed by a video of the exchange. Follow along as the Bush Team and Roger Ailes of Fox News notoriety sniff out the scheme at CBS, and prepare Bush to give Dan Rather the ass whooping of a life time.
CBS started with the setup from which they hoped to spring the trap:
It's fun to watch the trap sprung, then quickly fall apart as Bush would not back down. Rather received a lot of heat from his peers, as well he should! All of the questions that Rather attempted to ask had been asked and answered repeatedly, and most under oath. The answers were available, but Rather was attempting to make Bush look guilty by getting him to hedge on an answer, or stating that he was unable to remember. In the end, Bush came out on top.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
What follows is the story leading up to the interview, followed by a video of the exchange. Follow along as the Bush Team and Roger Ailes of Fox News notoriety sniff out the scheme at CBS, and prepare Bush to give Dan Rather the ass whooping of a life time.
CBS started with the setup from which they hoped to spring the trap:
When CBS requested an interview with Bush, the following letter was sent to the Bush campaign:What follows is the story of the lead up and the climax of the interview.
"Part of our early coverage of the 1988 presidential election has been a series of candidate profiles produced for 'CBS Evening News.' We purposely saved your profile for last. Dan Rather is very interested in your profile, and has decided to do it himself."
Copies of the letter were made and distributed throughout campaign headqurters. Bush was given a copy and handwrote the following on his:
"I feel comfortable with Rather. Make sure this guy gets reply soon."
[Dan Rather] was the living symbol, in conservative circles, of the power and presumption of the media....Rather had been working on an inquiry into the story of the veep, the Ayatollah and the Contra comandantes, and in January CBS put in for an interview with Bush — an extended sitting, the network said, to be edited down to five minutes or so of tape for a “profile” of the vice president.Reactions about the interview from members of the Bush family and staff, as well as quotes from members of the media can be found here. What follows is a video of the exchange courtesy, Media Research Center and Newsbusters.
“Ab-so-lute-ly no!” [Roger] Ailes exploded in a staff meeting. You could never trust TV guys in a tape situation. They weren’t on your side; they could edit your guy into oblivion. “Jesus,” Ailes said. “No, no, no!”
The request was rejected, and after fitful negotiations Bush’s men followed up with a counteroffer: Rather could have his interview, but it would be live or nothing.
Not all of them celebrated when the network said yes. Lee Atwater, for one, didn’t like the smell of it. He was a medley of tics and twitches even in repose, all flittering fingers and jouncing knees, and the Rather interview looked to him like a setup.
“I’d really watch that guy,” he said when Bush phoned in from New Hampshire the day of the telecast.
Bush laughed. You’re wrong, he said; he had known Rather since Texas, twenty-five years before, when Bush was in oil and Rather in local news.
“He’s a fair man,” the vice president said.
“All right,” Atwater answered. He was still nervous.
Ailes wasn’t. [Pollster Bob] Teeter had alerted him the night before that they were caught in a classic bait-and-switch; the word was around that the subject would be Iran-Contra and that CBS was going to open up half the show for it, Rather’s piece first, then the interview. Ailes made some calls, confirming the rumors; one mole told him people were running around the network boasting that they would take Bush out of the race. The warrior in Ailes wakened, and when Air Force Two landed in a snowstorm at Andrews Air Force Base that Monday evening, he and [Bush aide Craig] Fuller were waiting.
The limousine ride to town was the only chance they would have to prepare Bush for the likelihood that, as Ailes predicted, Rather would be coming at him like a mad dog.
Bush seemed insufficiently worried. “I’ve answered the question five hundred times,” he said. “I don’t see any big deal.”
“This is a big deal,” Ailes said. “All they have to do is press you on dates and bullshit that you haven’t had time to review, and you’re gonna look like you don’t know what you’re talking about. If somebody asked me what I had for lunch last Thursday, I wouldn’t know, but I’d look guilty trying to think about it.”
“No, no,” Bush said. “Dan Rather is a good newsman. He won’t do that.”
“Hey, “ Ailes said, “his job tonight is ratings. His ass is on the line. He doesn’t care about you. If he thought he could get away with it, he’d shoot you.”
The message registered, and Ailes used their time in the car to get Bush ready for combat. “Don’t accept anything Rather says to you,” he said. “Don’t accept the premise of any question — I don’t even care if it’s right. Stay on offense the whole time and wear him out.” He studied Bush. The guy wouldn’t fight unless he got mad, and what dependably would get him mad was the feeling that he was being treated unfairly.
“Watch that opening piece,” Ailes told him. “That’ll get you up.”
As it happened, Ailes had thought about what to fight with: a notorious incident several months earlier when Rather, on location in Miami, had got sore at having his newscast held up by a tennis match and had walked off his set to call New York to bitch about it.
The tennis match had ended in his absence, and CBS, with nothing else to put on the air, had gone to black — an empty screen — for six minutes. It was the ultimate embarrassment for a network, as Ailes reminded Bush; Rather would deny afterward that that had been his intent, but he caught heat for it.
“Look,” Ailes said, “he’s trying to judge your whole vice-presidency by this stuff. That’s like judging his whole career in broadcasting by six minutes when he acted like an asshole.”
It's fun to watch the trap sprung, then quickly fall apart as Bush would not back down. Rather received a lot of heat from his peers, as well he should! All of the questions that Rather attempted to ask had been asked and answered repeatedly, and most under oath. The answers were available, but Rather was attempting to make Bush look guilty by getting him to hedge on an answer, or stating that he was unable to remember. In the end, Bush came out on top.
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Input Needed!!
I've been so caught up in the redesign of the blog and adjusting the layout, that I didn't stop to consider some very important elements. Chiefly among those, input from the readership. If you have a second (and I know you do) answer the poll to the right in order to let me know what your screen resolution is set to.
If you're not familiar with where to determine your screen resolution Here are step by step instructions.
PS- Don't forget to take the other poll regarding impeaching Obama, further down the page!
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
If you're not familiar with where to determine your screen resolution Here are step by step instructions.
- Go to your desktop
- Right click anywhere on the desktop itself
- In the menu that appears, there is a option called 'Properties,' click it
- A new window will open with several tabs across the top, find the 'Settings' tab and click it
- On the 'Settings' window is a section called 'Screen resolution.' In that section, there should be a slider bar, and below that it tells you what your current resolution is set to.
- Once you've determined your resolution, click the 'Cancel' button, or the 'X' button in the upper right-hand corner to close the window
- If your resolution is set to 800x600 or smaller, or you had to follow the instructions in this guide, hold your hand up in front of you, so that the palm of your hand faces you
- Repeatedly smack yourself in the face for being a technoweenie
PS- Don't forget to take the other poll regarding impeaching Obama, further down the page!
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
New Poll Question
In the recent redesign of 'I Am Clasicaliberal And You Should, Too!' we've added a poll question in the widgets section within the right column of the blog. Our first poll question is "Should Republicans seek to impeach Obama over the Sestak and Romanoff bribes?"
Here's a little bit of background information on the issue, with further reading here. The statute that seems to have been breached would be this one:
18 U.S.C. § 600. Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
What say you? Would it be a worthy endeavor? Would the likely drawn out process be damaging to congressional Republicans? Have your say, and don't forget to vote!
Please take the time to comment! Click the Comment Link adjacent to the Post Title.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















